<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt/2304: reply / group reply behavior broken WRT $reply_to and $reply_self



The following reply was made to PR mutt/2304; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nicolas Rachinsky <mutt-devel-0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 
Subject: Re: mutt/2304: reply / group reply behavior broken WRT $reply_to and 
$reply_self
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:22:07 +0200

 * Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-07-17 17:45 +0200]:
 >  More precisely, mutt will not honor a reply-to header when
 >  replying to messages written by oneself unless reply_self is
 >  set.  The inference that's going on here is that the reply-to
 >  header is an address that points to the message's sender, so if
 >  the sender is removed from the recipient list, so is the
 >  reply-to header.  Strikes me as the right thing to do.
 
 I like the this (the current) behaviour.
 
 Nicolas
 
 -- 
 http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas