Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
From: Rocco Rutte <pdmef@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:37:43 +0000
In-reply-to: <20060713133727.GD6596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Organization: Berlin University of Technology
References: <44B29EC2.4010805@xxxxxxxxx> <20060711232756.GQ9875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060711233531.GI11269@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060712000829.GU9875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060712141345.GB6596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060712181501.GD14959@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060713092914.GC6596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060713133727.GD6596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11-pdmef-2006-07-05

Hi,

* TAKAHASHI Tamotsu [06-07-13 22:37:28 +0900] wrote:

Note: Without OPTCONFIRMHEADERS, and when $edit_headers=no, you
are totally unaware how your headers are modified by mailto-URL.
I strongly recommend OPTCONFIRMHEADERS feature. It forces you to
edit (or at least review) all your headers.

IIRC I did something similar for mutt-ng and turned $edit_headers on byforce along with a message.


  bye, Rocco
--
:wq!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu

References:
- CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release
  - From: Jonathan Smith
- Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release
  - From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release
  - From: Vincent Lefevre
- RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu

Prev by Date: Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
Next by Date: [PATCH] Fix CAPABILITY handling for IMAP
Previous by thread: Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
Next by thread: Re: RFC2368 security patch status (Re: CVE-2006-3242 and a new mutt release)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread