On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:05:05AM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > The essential problem is that when $reply_to is set (and there is a > Reply-to header), but $reply_self is unset, Mutt does the wrong thing. > It ignores the Reply-to header completely, whether the user is > REPLYing or GROUPREPLYing. This apparently is true of all versions of > Mutt including and prior to the current CVS. I missed a case where this is broken: if $reply_self is set, $reply_to is set, and the user REPLYs to a message with a reply-to header, Mutt will reply to the sender. It should reply to the reply-to address. Bizarrely, it works if the user GROUPREPLYs to the message. So the table becomes: > CMD RS RT header ex_TO ex_CC act_TO act_CC > R x - x S - > R - x x T - R - R x x x T - S - > R - - x R - > G x - x S R > G - x x T R R - > G x x x T R > G - - x R - -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgpg2lJ1w3Zm8.pgp
Description: PGP signature