<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt/2220: mutt does not parse wrapped From\ line



The following reply was made to PR mutt/2220; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Allen Rueter <allen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 
Subject: Re: mutt/2220: mutt does not parse wrapped From\  line
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 08:54:01 -0500

 I agree, the correct syntax of \nFrom\ , sometimes known as From_ ,
 is From envsender date [moreinfo]
 My apologies for not realizing this was mbox format issue vs header.
 
 Thanks for your time.
 
 On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:05:02AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR mutt/2220; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 > To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: mutt/2220: mutt does not parse wrapped From\  line
 > Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 06:05:41 +0200
 > 
 >  On 2006-05-02 23:47:12 +0200, allen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
 >  
 >  > Mutt can't see the message in the inbox.
 >  > I see in rfc 822 say mail headers over 65 to 72 in length
 >  > should be wrapped. Is ^From\  exculded?
 >  
 >  =46rom\  is not a mail header, but a separator line that is a
 >  function of the mbox format, and, hence, of the MUA
 >  implementation.  I've never seen anyone suggest
 >  wrapping syntax for this, so I'd advise not to do it.
 >  
 >  Not a bug.
 >  
 >  --=20
 >  Thomas Roessler                           <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 >  
 
 -- 
 
 Allen P. Rueter              314/935-6429 Fx:314/935-7302