<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [PATCH] Fix memory function use



On 2006-05-02 13:25:30 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:

> I don't see a good reason to deliberately use safe_free
> instead of FREE at the moment (or vv). Is there one?

One reason is that FREE just behaves like free, in that you
don't need to put in the & operator.  But that's about it.

I don't feel particularly strongly either way, but do think the
code should be consistent.

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.