On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:03:12PM -0400, John J. Foster wrote: > Derek, > > You make a lot of wonderful points in your post (all snipped because > that's really not why I'm replying). Thanks John. > I'm not sure if it's possible now, but is there any way to keep this > thread OFF of mutt-users? It's getting to be quite a pain. Sorry... I removed mutt-users from at least one of my posts, but forgot to keep doing it. I'll be more concientous about it in the future. It was someone else who posted the original thread there... Many replies will go to both places. FWIW, I do think that in general, the users who don't necessarily follow mutt-dev may well have valuable input to offer w/regard to whether a feature should be implemented or not, so I do think that such questions should be raised there. Also the thread has raised some interest; 6 messages in the thread appeared only on mutt-users. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgp13wainEFo5.pgp
Description: PGP signature