Re: [PATCH] replace setenv() with putenv()

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] replace setenv() with putenv()
From: David Champion <dgc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:10:04 -0500
In-reply-to: <20051009045706.GA287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20051005170015.GA26710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051006181856.F3051@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051006192803.GK26710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051009045706.GA287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.8i

* On 2005.10.08, in <20051009045706.GA287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
*       "Brendan Cully" <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I think I'd prefer the attached patch if it works. Does it?

It compiles, which is my main concern.  I haven't been following
the actual GPG_TTY issue that triggered the patch.  The setenv()
implementation looks functionally correct, so it should set a variable.
:)

Thanks!

-- 
 -D.    dgc@xxxxxxxxxxxx        NSIT    University of Chicago

References:
- [PATCH] replace setenv() with putenv()
  - From: David Champion
- Re: [PATCH] replace setenv() with putenv()
  - From: Moritz Barsnick
- Re: [PATCH] replace setenv() with putenv()
  - From: David Champion
- Re: [PATCH] replace setenv() with putenv()
  - From: Brendan Cully

Prev by Date: [2005-10-11] CVS repository changes
Next by Date: [PATCH] full large file support
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] replace setenv() with putenv()
Next by thread: [PATCH] make tags
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread