Re: mutt/973: encrypt mail with more keys than recipient list (think mailinglist)
The following reply was made to PR mutt/973; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>, "Marco d'Itri" <md@xxxxxxxx>,
128945@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mutt/973: encrypt mail with more keys than recipient list (think
mailinglist)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:41:49 -0400
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 07:05:00PM +0200, Rado Smiljanic wrote:
> Synopsis: encrypt mail with more keys than recipient list (think mailinglist)
I happen to agree that mutt should have a facility to select recipient
encryption keys independent of the message recipients; however as a
work-around you can define a macro to alter the commands to encrypt
messages to manually include the keys you want to include (i.e. create
one macro per mailing list, with a "-e recipient" added to the gpg
command line for each recipient). Define another macro to restore the
default.
It's yucky, but it should work.
--
Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDQr7dHEnASN++rQIRApXbAJ9CXJEdNEKiSD1lDIWTMisbPNcPLQCgiZs7
aTjvSwoc/ePo01YiFN6TGe8=
=L8ma
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--