Re: imap/2097: indication of new mail is not correct after pipe
The following reply was made to PR imap/2097; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc:
Subject: Re: imap/2097: indication of new mail is not correct after pipe
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:02:37 +0200 (CEST)
On Monday, October 3, 2005 at 22:15:02 +0200, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On some servers, I imagine, it's possible that fetching a message
> doesn't automatically mark it as read (thus why imap_peek behavior was
> originally created as an option). For what it's worth, I'm using
> BincIMAP.
I tried 2 servers: First an old uw-imapd 2001a that marks read from
origin N state, but as said not anymore after reading and <toggle-new>.
And another one, unknown, that doesn't mark read at all.
Bye! Alain.
--
When you want to reply to a mailing list, please avoid doing so from a
digest. This often builds incorrect references and breaks threads.