On Tue 06-Sep-2005 at 14:03 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > I think this would just cause confusion, until port 587 is widely > deployed by ISPs. I think most other MUAs still refer to SMTP > servers in their configuration directives anyway. Since when did mutt do the same thing as other MUAs when there was an obscure RFC that could be implemented instead? ;-) -- Bruno