Re: mutt/2052: manual entry for strict_threads is misleading

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>, levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mutt/2052: manual entry for strict_threads is misleading
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:03:29 +0200
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <mutt-pr-2052@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

Synopsis: manual entry for strict_threads is misleading

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: brendan
State-Changed-When: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:03:29 +0200
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in CVS.



**** Comment added by brendan on Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:03:29 +0200 ****

Prev by Date: Re: mutt/1591: missing 'push string' example
Next by Date: Re: mutt/2039: doc: hide_top_* mismatch?
Previous by thread: Re: mutt/1867: Port patch-1.5.1-de.threads_config.1 to current dev tree?
Next by thread: [2005-09-05] CVS repository changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread