Re: mutt/1853: Esc+l does not work right when a filter matches no messages

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>, zinie@xxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph von Stuckrad <stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Grant Bowman <grantbow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mutt/1853: Esc+l does not work right when a filter matches no messages
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:58:49 +0200
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <mutt-pr-1853@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

Synopsis: Esc+l does not work right when a filter matches no messages

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: brendan
State-Changed-When: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:58:49 +0200
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed in CVS (Alain's patch applied).



**** Comment added by brendan on Sun, 04 Sep 2005 07:58:49 +0200 ****

Prev by Date: Re: mutt/1443: Sorting mailbox sometimes causes a segmentation fault.
Next by Date: Re: mutt/1906: surprising behaviour in mutt 1.5* versus 1.4* with empty result of limits
Previous by thread: Re: mutt/1853: Esc+l does not work right when a filter matches no messages
Next by thread: Re: mutt/1906: surprising behaviour in mutt 1.5* versus 1.4* with
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread