Re: mutt/1906: surprising behaviour in mutt 1.5* versus 1.4* with empty result of limits

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>, stucki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Enrico Zini <zinie@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Grant Bowman <grantbow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mutt/1906: surprising behaviour in mutt 1.5* versus 1.4* with empty result of limits
From: Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 10:48:25 +0200
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <mutt-pr-1906@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx

Synopsis: surprising behaviour in mutt 1.5* versus 1.4* with empty result of 
limits

**** Comment added by ab on Thu, 01 Sep 2005 10:48:25 +0200 ****
     crossrefs, delete corrupted attachment.

Prev by Date: Re: mutt/1495: macro with ë
Next by Date: Re: mutt/1519: when replying to pgp-encrypted mail, message ist *not* included in reply
Previous by thread: Re: mutt/1906: surprising behaviour in mutt 1.5* versus 1.4* with empty result of limits
Next by thread: Re: mutt/1906: surprising behaviour in mutt 1.5* versus 1.4* with empty result of limits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread