Re: mutt/2036: Incorporate stuff-all-quoted patch

To: Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mutt/2036: Incorporate stuff-all-quoted patch
From: Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:10:43 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <E1E92Pk-0000hx-RO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
References: <mutt-pr-2036@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1E92Pk-0000hx-RO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i-ja.1

 On Saturday, August 27, 2005 at 5:16:12 PM +0200, Rado Smiljanic wrote:

> closed for being duplicate of 2008 (ab, why didn't you close it)?

    Half because I'm not accustomed yet to what replaces merging, and
half because I support Gary's stuff-all-quoted inclusion. ;-)


    So what to do with dupes in general: Close all but the first? Will
it not risk to lose some infos? Will it not be uselessely rude to
submitters?

    I like more your crossref #nnn in keywords way.


Bye!    Alain.
-- 
How to Report Bugs Effectively
<URL:http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mutt/2036: Incorporate stuff-all-quoted patch
  - From: Paul Walker

References:
- Re: mutt/2036: Incorporate stuff-all-quoted patch
  - From: Rado Smiljanic

Prev by Date: Re: Expiration period for feedback requests
Next by Date: Re: mutt/2036: Incorporate stuff-all-quoted patch
Previous by thread: Re: mutt/2036: Incorporate stuff-all-quoted patch
Next by thread: Re: mutt/2036: Incorporate stuff-all-quoted patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread