<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

mutt/1274: IMAP / limited view: new messages not always detected



The following reply was made to PR mutt/1274; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: bug-any@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 
Subject: mutt/1274: IMAP / limited view: new messages not always detected
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:17:43 -0700

 On Sunday, 07 August 2005 at 15:25, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 ...
   < * 148 FETCH (UID 202251 FLAGS (\Seen) INTERNALDATE " 6-Aug-2005 22:38:42 
+0200" RFC822.SIZE 1607 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS ("DATE" "FROM" "SUBJECT" "TO" "CC" 
"MESSAGE-ID" "REFERENCES" "CONTENT-TYPE" "CONTENT-DESCRIPTION" "IN-REPLY-TO" 
"REPLY-TO" "LINES" "LIST-POST" "X-LABEL")] {398}
   Handling FETCH
   FETCH response ignored for this message
   imap_read_literal: reading 398 bytes
   < )
   < a0004 OK FETCH completed
   imap_open_mailbox: msgcount is 148
   > a0005 UID STORE 202161 FLAGS.SILENT (\Seen \Flagged)
   < * 149 EXISTS
   Handling EXISTS
   cmd_handle_untagged: New mail in INBOX - 149 messages total.
   < * 1 RECENT
   < a0005 OK UID STORE completed
   imap_cmd_finish: Fetching new mail
   message.c:99: mutt_mktemp returns "/var/tmp/mutt-dixsept-325-24381-1".
   > a0006 FETCH 149:149 (UID FLAGS INTERNALDATE RFC822.SIZE 
BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC MESSAGE-ID REFERENCES 
CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT-DESCRIPTION IN-REPLY-TO REPLY-TO LINES LIST-POST X-LABEL)])
   < * 149 FETCH (UID 202263 FLAGS (\Recent) INTERNALDATE " 7-Aug-2005 14:30:10 
+0200" RFC822.SIZE 1312 BODY[HEADER.FIELDS ("DATE" "FROM" "SUBJECT" "TO" "CC" 
"MESSAGE-ID" "REFERENCES" "CONTENT-TYPE" "CONTENT-DESCRIPTION" "IN-REPLY-TO" 
"REPLY-TO" "LINES" "LIST-POST" "X-LABEL")] {251}
   Handling FETCH
   FETCH response ignored for this message
   imap_read_literal: reading 251 bytes
   < )
   parse_parameters: `charset=iso-8859-1'
   parse_parameter: `charset' = `iso-8859-1'
   < a0006 OK FETCH completed
   > a0007 EXPUNGE
   < a0007 OK Mailbox checkpointed, but no messages expunged
 ...
 
 Hmm, I'm afraid it doesn't help. Everything looks perfectly normal in
 this trace. I have no idea how to reproduce the problem at the moment.