Re: [PATCH] QDBM Backend support for hcache

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] QDBM Backend support for hcache
From: md@xxxxxxxx (Marco d'Itri)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:17:19 +0200
In-reply-to: <20050728082134.GC7566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050728082134.GC7566@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Jul 28, Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello Thomas,
> please apply.
Can you provide some performance data which could justify using qdbm
instead of one of the other database libraries?

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] QDBM Backend support for hcache
  - From: Kyle Wheeler

References:
- [PATCH] QDBM Backend support for hcache
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann

Prev by Date: Re: mutt/1274
Next by Date: mutt/1274: Re: mutt/1274
Previous by thread: [PATCH] QDBM Backend support for hcache
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] QDBM Backend support for hcache
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread