<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [PATCH] indexcolor patch, next iteration



Hello Christian,

 On Sunday, March 6, 2005 at 4:43:01 PM +0100, Christian Aichinger wrote:

> another version of my indexcolor patch

    Version v3 breaks aligment of "%>X" expandos. Fields on the right
are not stuck to the right border, but randomly before. With
index_format="%4C %Z %[%_d %b %y %_H:%M] %?M?=%-4M&%5c? %s%>-[%-17.17F]"
on a 94 columns terminal I get only max 74 used columns, with some
misaligned names:

|  162  s   7 jui 98 13:33  1,2K send-hook question--[Ralf Hildebrandt ]
|  163      9 jui 98  1:14  0,7K `->---------------------[Michael R. Elkins]
|  164  s   9 jui 98 12:36  1,4K   `->-------------------[Ralf Hildebrandt ]
|  165  s   9 jui 98 15:05  1,0K     `->-----------------[Stefan `Sec` Zehl]
|  166      9 jui 98 15:42  0,6K       `->---------------[Michael D. Ivey  ]


Bye!    Alain.
-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?