Re: [PATCH] indexcolor patch, next iteration
Hello Christian,
On Sunday, March 6, 2005 at 4:43:01 PM +0100, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> another version of my indexcolor patch
Version v3 breaks aligment of "%>X" expandos. Fields on the right
are not stuck to the right border, but randomly before. With
index_format="%4C %Z %[%_d %b %y %_H:%M] %?M?=%-4M&%5c? %s%>-[%-17.17F]"
on a 94 columns terminal I get only max 74 used columns, with some
misaligned names:
| 162 s 7 jui 98 13:33 1,2K send-hook question--[Ralf Hildebrandt ]
| 163 9 jui 98 1:14 0,7K `->---------------------[Michael R. Elkins]
| 164 s 9 jui 98 12:36 1,4K `->-------------------[Ralf Hildebrandt ]
| 165 s 9 jui 98 15:05 1,0K `->-----------------[Stefan `Sec` Zehl]
| 166 9 jui 98 15:42 0,6K `->---------------[Michael D. Ivey ]
Bye! Alain.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?