Re: What should go into 1.5.7?

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
From: Werner Koch <wk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:32:57 +0100
In-reply-to: <20050127183342.GL7841@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Thomas Roessler's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:33:42 +0100")
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Openpgp: id=5B0358A2; url=finger:wk@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
References: <20050126115002.GH4589@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127175525.GA14826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127183342.GL7841@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:33:42 +0100, Thomas Roessler said:

>> patch-1.5.4.vk.pgp_verbose_mime
>> Add a filename and description to MIME signatures.
>> Added 2003-09-13.

> Bloat.

IIRC, a filename in PGP/MIME signatures is helpful for Outlook users.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

References:
- What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Marco d'Itri
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Thomas Roessler

Prev by Date: Re: Mutt Next Generation
Next by Date: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
Previous by thread: Re: xterm title (What should go into 1.5.7?)
Next by thread: Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread