[PATCH] message counting vs unset mark_old
Cleaning out some entries from RH bugzilla:
Original patch from Richard Henderson: (<rth@xxxxxxxxxx>)
...
Description of problem:
I have to use "unset mark_old" with IMAP, due to the fact that
the IMAP server considers the message new iff it has never been
touched in any way by any MUA. I want to consider the message
new if I have never read the message, nor have I re-marked it new.
This works ok, but there are minor buglets in mutt's message
counting when "unset mark_old" is in effect.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mutt-1.4-4
...
Patch applies to 1.5.6 as well.
Bill
--- mx.c.orig Tue Aug 6 10:47:05 2002
+++ mx.c Tue Aug 6 10:47:47 2002
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@
if (!ctx->hdrs[j]->read)
{
ctx->unread++;
- if (!ctx->hdrs[j]->old)
+ if (!ctx->hdrs[j]->old || !option(OPTMARKOLD))
ctx->new++;
}
--- imap/imap.c.markold Sun Apr 7 14:19:14 2002
+++ imap/imap.c Tue Aug 6 14:34:06 2002
@@ -1140,7 +1140,6 @@
/* returns count of recent messages if new = 1, else count of total messages.
* (useful for at least postponed function)
- * Question of taste: use RECENT or UNSEEN for new?
* 0+ number of messages in mailbox
* -1 error while polling mailboxes
*/
@@ -1191,7 +1190,7 @@
mutt_bit_isset(idata->capabilities,STATUS))
{
snprintf (buf, sizeof (buf), "STATUS %s (%s)", mbox,
- new ? "RECENT" : "MESSAGES");
+ new ? (option(OPTMARKOLD) ? "RECENT" : "UNSEEN") : "MESSAGES");
}
else
/* Server does not support STATUS, and this is not the current mailbox.