Re: libmbox: High performance MBOX file format library
On 2005-01-25 23:38:57 +0000, Paul Walker wrote:
> I can't guarantee anything even then, mind, but you'd probably be
> closer.
The basic question would be whether one would win anything beyond a
alleged performance increase, e.g., in terms of maintainability.
The other question would be whether there are changes to the mutt
code base that could yield the same performance increase without
trading that for, say, even more memory use.
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.