<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: multipart/alternative in QP encoding - mutt bug or user error?



On 2004-05-19 15:03:50 +0100, Ian Collier wrote:

> Now it's presumably an error to say that a multipart mail is in
> QP format when in fact only the individual parts are, but I think
> that mutt should either fail gracefully or work around the
> obvious error.  What say the developers?

Fix the sending software, fix it now.  multipart/* MUST NOT be
encoded.

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.