Re: [PATCH] generic spam detection
* On 2004.04.12, in <20040412204852.GT5807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
* "Thomas Roessler" <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This indeed looks very appealing for CVS inclusion. I'd be curious
> to hear about any experience people have with the patch.
>
> Suggested tweaking:
>
> - Add documentation.
> - Add both lexical and numerical sorting by spam tag.
>
> (This would make your patch a useful generalization of Rogier
> Wolff's proposed spam-score sorting patch.)
Just a follow-up, so this isn't lost: I'm in! I'm a little busy now, but
I'll definitely look into this when I get a chance.
I haven't heard anything back from any users, myself. Not sure whether
anyone's using it or not. If anyone is, I'd be interested in hearing,
too.
--
-D. dgc@xxxxxxxxxxxx NSIT University of Chicago