bug#1754: marked as done (missing newline in manual)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:26:33 +0100
with message-id <20040112202633.GK5446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and subject line bug#1754: missing newline in manual
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Herr der Kaefer
(administrator, GUUG bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.guug.de; 9 Jan 2004 23:02:24 +0000
>From md@xxxxxxxx Sat Jan 10 00:02:14 2004
Received: from attila.bofh.it ([213.92.8.2] ident=postfix)
by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Af5dp-0004QX-00
for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:02:09 +0100
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 9CCD25F76E; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:04:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 5C4FA1BEF3; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:19:05 +0100 (CET)
From: Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx>
To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: missing newline in manual
X-GUUG-CC: 226936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-Id: <20040109221905.5C4FA1BEF3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:19:05 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-104.0 required=4.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_20,HTML_10_20,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,
SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE,USER_IN_WHITELIST
version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.5.1-20040105+1
Severity: minor
[NOTE: this bug report has been submitted to the debian BTS as Bug#226936.
Please Cc all your replies to 226936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .]
From: Matt Kraai <kraai@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: missing newline in manual
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 02:57:45 -0800
The manual is missing a line between the usage summaries for
reply-hook and send-hook:
Usage: reply-hook [!]pattern command Usage: send-hook [!]pattern
command
The attached patch fixes it.
--
Matt Kraai kraai@xxxxxxxxx
--- mutt-1.5.5.1/doc/manual.sgml.head-old 2004-01-09 02:50:51.000000000
-0800
+++ mutt-1.5.5.1/doc/manual.sgml.head 2004-01-09 02:51:09.000000000 -0800
@@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@
<sect1>Change settings based upon message recipients<label
id="send-hook"><label id="reply-hook">
<p>
-Usage: <tt/reply-hook/ [!]<em/pattern/ <em/command/
+Usage: <tt/reply-hook/ [!]<em/pattern/ <em/command/<newline>
Usage: <tt/send-hook/ [!]<em/pattern/ <em/command/
These commands can be used to execute arbitrary configuration commands based
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 1754-done) by bugs.guug.de; 12 Jan 2004 20:24:30 +0000
>From roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mon Jan 12 21:24:28 2004
Received: from does-not-exist.info ([217.160.221.198]
helo=kamino.does-not-exist.org)
by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag8bn-0007Vv-00
for <1754-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:24:23 +0100
Received: from voyager.does-not-exist.org (p3E9B9E82.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[62.155.158.130])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by kamino.does-not-exist.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 36453314164; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:26:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by voyager.does-not-exist.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
id D1BF480C8; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:26:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:26:33 +0100
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx>, 1754-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 226936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bug#1754: missing newline in manual
Message-ID: <20040112202633.GK5446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20040109221905.5C4FA1BEF3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040109221905.5C4FA1BEF3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-108.1 required=4.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,HTML_10_20,IN_REP_TO,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT,USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Thanks. The patch has been committed to the CVS.
On 2004-01-09 23:19:05 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> From: Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx>
> To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:19:05 +0100 (CET)
> Subject: bug#1754: missing newline in manual
> Reply-To: Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx>, 1754@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.5.1-20040105+1
> Severity: minor
>
> [NOTE: this bug report has been submitted to the debian BTS as Bug#226936.
> Please Cc all your replies to 226936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .]
>
> From: Matt Kraai <kraai@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: missing newline in manual
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 02:57:45 -0800
>
> The manual is missing a line between the usage summaries for
> reply-hook and send-hook:
>
> Usage: reply-hook [!]pattern command Usage: send-hook [!]pattern
> command
>
> The attached patch fixes it.
>
> --
> Matt Kraai kraai@xxxxxxxxx
>
> --- mutt-1.5.5.1/doc/manual.sgml.head-old 2004-01-09 02:50:51.000000000
> -0800
> +++ mutt-1.5.5.1/doc/manual.sgml.head 2004-01-09 02:51:09.000000000 -0800
> @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@
>
> <sect1>Change settings based upon message recipients<label
> id="send-hook"><label id="reply-hook">
> <p>
> -Usage: <tt/reply-hook/ [!]<em/pattern/ <em/command/
> +Usage: <tt/reply-hook/ [!]<em/pattern/ <em/command/<newline>
> Usage: <tt/send-hook/ [!]<em/pattern/ <em/command/
>
> These commands can be used to execute arbitrary configuration commands based
>
>
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>