<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: list-new



On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:03:31PM -0200, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15 2003 at 01:57:01AM BRST, John Iverson <johni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri 14 Nov 2003 at 06:51am +0000, corey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
> > > Is there a "list-new" command?  Similar to "list-reply"... only
> > > instead of replying to a message, it uh, well, prepares a _new_
> > > message to the specified list?
<snip>
> > So just remove the In-Reply-To: field in your editor.
> 
>         That's not really a clean way to do it, is it?
<snippage> 
>         So I've just put together a patch (attached) that creates a new
> function, "list-mail". It's (supposed to be) a merger of "mail" and
> "list-reply": if called on a message recognized as a list message, it starts
> a new mail to that list. 
>
<snippity-snip>
> (perhaps even get it > incorporated into mainstream). 
<snip>


  I would simply like to give a patch along these lines being included into
  mutt a very strong +1.

  I'm very surprised that mutt doesn't already include such a feature - in
  fact it can hardly be called a feature... if there's a 'list-reply' cmd,
  it only makes sense that there be a 'list-mail'/'list-new' cmd as well.

  Editing headers and/or creating custom hooks in order to provide such a 
  common action seems kinda lame...

  ( I'm not subscribed to mutt-dev, but I just had to respond in favor to
    this patch )


Beers,

Corey