-- ciao, | Marco | [3059 saZbdQ8ikmiQA]
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx>, 219499@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Bug#219499: more segfaults
- From: Adam Kessel <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:47:27 -0800
- In-reply-to: <20031113180818.GB4886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20031113174649.GB1131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20031113180818.GB4886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:08:18PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 13, Adam Kessel <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Here's a couple more segfaults I got recently. Is it useful to keep > >sending these, or do you have enough information? Does any of this > >suggest the problem is elsewhere than mutt? > As the mutt author replied, this may be fixed in CVS. > I will try packaging it next week. I've been using CVS now for the last day and so far no segfaults. -- Adam Kessel http://bostoncoop.net/adamAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---