bug#1701: marked as done (Example file for bug report: mutt-1.4.1i: Mutt does not display...)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:47:57 +0100
with message-id <20031111114757.GH20897@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and subject line bug#1701: Example file for bug report: mutt-1.4.1i: Mutt does
not display...
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Herr der Kaefer
(administrator, GUUG bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.guug.de; 11 Nov 2003 10:23:21 +0000
>From msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Nov 11 11:23:18 2003
Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211])
by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AJVg6-0004qI-00
for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:23:18 +0100
Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de
[129.206.119.234])
by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
hABAPmsR028370
for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:48 +0100 (MET)
Received: from janus.cl.uni-heidelberg.de (janus.cl.uni-heidelberg.de
[147.142.207.16])
by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA42322
for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:48 +0100
Received: from tucana.cl.uni-heidelberg.de ([147.142.207.26] ident=root)
by janus.cl.uni-heidelberg.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AJViW-0006ty-00
for <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:48 +0100
Received: from msdemlei by tucana.cl.uni-heidelberg.de with local (Exim 3.34 #1)
id 1AJViV-0000yr-00
for submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:47 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:47 +0100
From: Markus Demleitner <msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Example file for bug report: mutt-1.4.1i: Mutt does not display...
Message-ID: <20031111102547.GA3765@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: mutt
Version: 1.4.1i
Severity: normal
Sorry for all the confusion. This attachment should have gone with
the bug "Mutt does not display..." (and I forget the rest because
I erroneously assumed the bug report had ended up in my sent-mail
folder and thus deleted the copy sent to me by muttbug). I tried
sending it separately but of course left out the package line and
thus got back a complaint.
Anyway: The mail in the attached mbox does not display correctly.
Whew.
Thanks,
Markus
--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=bad-mbox
>From info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Mon Nov 10 20:05:47 2003
Return-path: <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envelope-to: msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:05:47 +0100
Received: from janus.cl.uni-heidelberg.de ([147.142.207.16])
by tucana.cl.uni-heidelberg.de with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1)
id 1AJHMB-0000UN-00
for msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:05:47
+0100
Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212])
by janus.cl.uni-heidelberg.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AJHMB-0002uT-00
for <msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:05:47 +0100
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183])
by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
hAAJ5jaj026605
for <msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:05:45 +0100
(MET)
Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1AJHHm-0002tR-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:01:14 +0100
Received: from [213.39.150.59] (helo=m8064166-1)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1AJHHi-00045z-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:01:13 +0100
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:01:09 +0100
Mime-version: 1.0
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?EIL-AKTION: Keine deutsche B=FCrgschaft f=FCr
Urwaldvernichtung!?=
From: "Rettet den Regenwald e.V." <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-Id: <1110201.RQGGQWCN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: MBM 2.9f5-DE
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
auth:5520dddca169fd2e76020b81303b088f
X-SpamProbe: GOOD 0.0000000 196e06cf0178b34032e51da8706a7ad0
Status: RO
Content-Length: 799
Lines: 16
Die Bundesregierung pr=FCft derzeit, ob eine Papierfabrik in China, in der
indonesischer Zellstoff verarbeitet werden soll, mit einer Hermesb=FCrgschaft
abgesichert wird. Die indonesische Zellstoff- und Papierindustrie ist f=FCr
gro=DFfl=E4chige Regenwaldzerst=F6rungen verantwortlich. Bitte fordern Sie die
Bundesregierung per Protestmail auf, keine deutschen Steuergelder f=FCr
Waldvernichtung einzusetzen! Auf unserer homepage finden Sie einen Musterbrief
unter http://www.regenwald.org
Herzlichen Dank f=FCr Ihre Unterst=FCtzung.
Ihr
Reinhard Behrend
P.S. Wenn Sie keine weiteren Informationen w=FCnschen, senden Sie uns bitte
eine kurze Mail. Danke.
Rettet den Regenwald e. V.
Friedhofsweg 28
22337 Hamburg
Tel. 040 - 4103804
Fax: 040 - 4500144
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.regenwald.ORG
--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 1701-done) by bugs.guug.de; 11 Nov 2003 11:46:28 +0000
>From roessler+bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Nov 11 12:46:25 2003
Received: from does-not-exist.info ([217.160.221.198]
helo=kamino.does-not-exist.org)
by trithemius.gnupg.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AJWyX-0005wq-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:46:25 +0100
Received: from voyager.does-not-exist.org (p3E9B9EFB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
[62.155.158.251])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by kamino.does-not-exist.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8C6673140D5; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:48:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by voyager.does-not-exist.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
id A1A198114; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:47:57 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:47:57 +0100
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Markus Demleitner <msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
1701-done@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bug#1701: Example file for bug report: mutt-1.4.1i: Mutt does not
display...
Message-ID: <20031111114757.GH20897@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20031111102547.GA3765@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031111102547.GA3765@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-108.7 required=5.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT,
USER_IN_WHITELIST
autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
The attachment is malformed -- quoted-printable encoded lines MUST
NOT be longer than 76 characters. (Note that longer lines can be
encoded using soft line breaks, which has not happened in this
specific example.)
On 2003-11-11 11:25:47 +0100, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> From: Markus Demleitner <msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:47 +0100
> Subject: bug#1701: Example file for bug report: mutt-1.4.1i: Mutt does not
> display...
> Reply-To: Markus Demleitner <msdemlei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> 1701@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.4.1i
> Severity: normal
>
> Sorry for all the confusion. This attachment should have gone with
> the bug "Mutt does not display..." (and I forget the rest because
> I erroneously assumed the bug report had ended up in my sent-mail
> folder and thus deleted the copy sent to me by muttbug). I tried
> sending it separately but of course left out the package line and
> thus got back a complaint.
>
> Anyway: The mail in the attached mbox does not display correctly.
> Whew.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Markus
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>