<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on Rude TSA personnel; uneven liquids policies





Begin forwarded message:

From: Serge Egelman <egelman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: October 16, 2006 9:52:44 AM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] more on Rude TSA personnel; uneven liquids policies

I just flew to NYC last week to visit my sister for the weekend.  Going
through the Pittsburgh airport, I was told that I had too much
toothpaste.  I told the agent that I was under the impression that we
were allowed 3oz.  He said that was correct, but my toothpaste tube
clearly says 6oz on it.  I explained that since the tube is less than
half full, I am clearly in compliance.  He said something like, "I
understand your position, but the tube says 6oz."  "But it's less than
half full."  "It says 6oz on it."  "Okay, using your powers of
reasoning, what volume of toothpaste would you say currently remains in
this tube?"  "Less than 3oz."  "So then I'm in compliance."  "No sir,
the tube says 6oz."

I gather that from this line of reasoning that you can bring any volume
of liquid as long as it's labeled as 3oz.  The robots apparently won't
have problems with that.

serge

David Farber wrote:


Begin forwarded message:

From: mary hodder <mary@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: October 16, 2006 8:51:07 AM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] Rude TSA personnel; uneven liquids policies

1. An interesting thing: my friend Phil, who isn't the brightest person
ever, told me was that as a TSA screener at LAX, they had
recently asked him and everyone else to sign a loyalty oath that also
promised to treat all passengers with dignity.

He said he'd refused on the grounds that every single they they do
screening people is undignified treatment toward the passengers.
As he says he told the bosses, "We go through all their dirty underwear
and feel them up, harass them and grill them on every little bottle of
shampoo, and it's totally demeaning. I can't pledge to treat them in a
dignified manner and keep doing the screenings."

I was really surprised to hear this, but it made me happy that he got it.

2. On another note, in Gatwick two weeks ago, I took a photo of one of
the signs posted about every 5 feet warning people not
to assault the personnel either verbally or physically. This was while
waiting to check in, in a line of over 1000.  Then we went
to security, which was more than double.  It took an hour and 15 to
check in, and 2 hours to get through security.  I gather it's routine
by the locals to get to Gatwick hours ahead if you fly Easyjet (which I
won't ever do again).

An employee came rushing over and demanded I delete the photo I'd taken
of him.  I said I'd never seen him before because he was sitting
behind all the standing customers and I was just taking a picture of the sign. He wanted to see it, and it was the sign, and made me delete it.
But I actually had about 20 of the signs in different areas, so it
wasn't a loss.  But they are clearly very paranoid.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/maryhodder/271237097/

My co-passenger remarked, "If you have to hang signs like that
everywhere, you have a real customer relations problem, and this is all
going to break really soon.  There is way too much tension in here."

One of the signs I took said you could fly with liquids bought in the
airport, to Europe and Asia, but was prohibited from flying from the US.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/maryhodder/271237096/

3.  The weekend before Gatwick I flew from Amsterdam to London on
Easyjet.  Everyone got on the plane with bottles of juice and liquids,
soda, etc.  Clearly Amsterdam is super relaxed in many ways.

You should note that Easyjet charges for everything, including $3 for an 8 oz bottle of water. So everyone wants to bring liquids onto the plane
due to limited and bad selections, and expensive prices.

We were flying to Amsterdam, but the airport security people still
tagged a passenger's backpack before boarding the plane.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/maryhodder/271237094/



On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:34 AM, David Farber wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

From: Esmé Vos <isolde100@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: October 16, 2006 12:43:38 AM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Rude TSA personnel; uneven liquids policies

For IP if you wish.

I posted this on my blog today
(http://www.rosecantine.com/archives/193/) about the uneven TSA
liquids policies in SF, Boston and Houston:

In addition to yelling and screaming at the top of their lungs like
their colleagues in other airports, Logan TSA people try to project
the image that they are really doing something to ensure you security.
And this is how they do it:
I checked in a little plastic bag with liquids. The bag went through
the scanner and immediately, an alert TSA employee, no doubt keeping
us safe from those nasty people told me that the little plastic bag
was too big. Never mind that the same plastic bag went through San
Francisco Airport's security without any problems. So to make us feel
that they are doing a spectacular job, they decided to confiscate a
nearly empty bottle of contact lens solution. But they let the plastic
bag through anyway.

When I said, "But this bag and all of its contents went through San
Francisco with no problem," the TSA guy retorted, "Yeah, but San
Francisco is San Francisco."

Yes, folks, don't you feel so much safer now that airport security
people in a single country can't agree on standard procedures and even
criticize their own colleagues in another city? By the way, the same
little plastic bag filled with eye drops, lip gloss, hand creme and
hair gel just sailed right through Houston's airport, right in Bush
country.

I love the Tyler Brule column in the Financial Times this weekend in
which he rips TSA apart for the degrading manner in which they treat
passengers.

"Having just witnessed a humiliating attack on a defenceless elderly
gentleman at La Guardia airport, it's time to create an enforceable
charter of human rights for passengers and a tough set of standards
that airports, airlines and affiliated businesses must abide by."

. . .

"As the gentleman tried to collect his things and bundle them in his
arms the security guard moved in closer. 'Sir, this is a federal
inspection area and you must move on. You must do so in the fastest
manner possible sir!' The man gently nodded but dropped a shoe in his
haste and the barrage of passive-aggressive security-speak started
over again. I motioned to go and help the man but he pulled himself
together and then shuffled away to find a place to put on his shoes."

"I immediately told the security man that terrorising people was not
part of his job description. 'Sir, you're in a federal inspection area
. . . "' he began. '. . . and as a result you're a representative of
the federal government and you're not putting on the best face for
Washington by abusing a man in his 80s,' I retaliated."

"Unfortunately, this scene isn't limited to just the airports of the
Port Authority but plays itself out all over North America, pockets of
Europe, Australia and beyond. Passengers recognise the need for
stricter security measures but with them have come a culture of
belligerent behaviour that's going unchecked by the security companies
who win contracts, the airports that award them and the governments
that are supposed to police the system."


(Brule column is at:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/658a3126-5b21-11db-8f80-0000779e2340.html)

Sincerely,
Esme Vos
Founder
Muniwireless.com


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as mary@xxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


Mary Hodder
CEO:  Dabble
Blogs:  Dabble.com/blog
Napsterization.org/stories



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as serge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/

--
/*
Serge Egelman

PhD Candidate
Vice President for External Affairs, Graduate Student Assembly
Carnegie Mellon University

Legislative Concerns Chair
National Association of Graduate-Professional Students
*/


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/