[IP] more on more on YUP!! results of uk ban
BTW I assume that the reason they ban the carry-on liguids you buy
AFTER security is that they have no real trust in the security of the
"secured" areas. Too many low paid non cleared people work there.
Dave
Begin forwarded message:
From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@xxxxxxxx>
Date: August 10, 2006 11:51:45 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] more on YUP!! results of uk ban
Given that we had a few "experts" on this list about 3 weeks ago
talking about the risks of "liquids" I think we should turn them in
to Scotland Yard. It's just too, too convenient that they were
talking about this so close to the event, don't you think?
It should be illegal to talk about any technology that we could
fantasize might be used by suicide bombers on any internet service
that can be read by anyone who doesn't have a security clearance, right?
And by the way, the CRC handbook should be removed from college and
high school library shelves. Those dangerous chemical and physical
facts can easily be used to damage the hull of airplanes (it would
take me 5 mintues to take an airliner down with items that it would
be extremely hard to prevent me carrying on board - perhaps if you
thought about it, you could do so also. They teach stuff like that,
I'm told, to all CIA agents).
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/