<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on Who they're spying on DO READ





Begin forwarded message:

From: Bob Perdriau <bobp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 15, 2006 8:07:12 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] more on Who they're spying on DO READ

I found Brock's article on lists interesting. Still the average person can hardly be expected to differentiate between lists, especially as the government will say nothing useful explaining them.

I think the main point of Anonymous' communication is that the government has succeeded in cowering he and his wife.

I concur.

Exactly a year ago my wife and I were flying from Seattle to Juno, AK to join a cruise. There were a large number of people getting on the same flight for the same purpose and the airline opened a special check-in line just for cruise passengers. The first passenger in line was singled out and told he could not fly. When the TSA people realized we were all going on the same cruise they refused to let any of us board. Much discussion got us nowhere for quite some time. Finally, they took our drivers licenses and other ID and disappeared behind closed doors. When they returned we were all permitted to board. The process took over two hours and the only reason we made the flight was that it had mechanical problems that had delayed it. Failing that, we would have missed the ship's departure as there were no flights until the next day.

The economic cost of that would have been quite staggering to say nothing of missed vacations. Anybody believe TSA would pick up the tab? Didn't think so.


On Jun 15, 2006, at 3:04 PM, David Farber wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

From: "Brock N. Meeks" <bmeeks@xxxxxxx>
Date: June 15, 2006 5:58:14 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] Who they're spying on DO READ

As abhorrent as the TSA list is, I think it's also imperative that when we go to battle over such things that we at least get the terms straight so
that we know what we're debating.

I can guarantee you that Mr. Anonymous' wife was not and IS NOT on the "Do No Fly" list. I will put up $5,000 on a bet to back up my statement if Mr.
Anon wants to take me up on it.

You see, there are TWO lists that come into play here, one is the hardcore "do not fly" list. A person appearing on that list WILL NOT FLY; they are known, criminal threats to aviation security and would be jailed if they are
caught.

The second list is much more nefarious because it catches so many people in its net, such as Mr. Anon's wife. TSA refers to this list as the "selectee list." This is the list that has caught several famous people in its web because their names are the same or similar to those that appear on the
selectee list.

I wrote a piece about this for MSNBC just about a year ago called "Faces of
the No Fly List" (and of course, the headline writer was fudging, too,
because no on in my story was actually on the "no fly" list).

You can read it here:  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8705746/




On 6/15/06 3:09 PM, "David Farber" <dave@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Anonymous
Date: June 15, 2006
Subject: Re: Who they're spying on

There are many unknown consequences from the recent laws
circumventing privacy and security constraints on the government.
For example, the TSA "Do Not Fly" (DNF) list is being used by law
enforcement agencies to capture anyone with an outstanding want or
warrant.  As we all know TSA will not tell you why your name is on
the list.  Moreover, they will not say where the names come from that
are on the list.

My wife ended up on the list, which lead to a 2+ hour wait to be
cleared at the airport. During that time we talked with several TSA
people and one police officer.  After TSA finally decided she could
fly, they invoked the standard procedure to clear someone which was
to have a local police officer run a warrant/want check.  I mentioned
to the TSA officer that the DNF list sounds like a good way to
capture anyone wanted for a crime. He said yes, and I believe he said
that some law enforcement organizations were putting many names on
the list.

I asked Dave to make this posting anonymous because after this
problem with the DNF list, which went on for several months/trips, my
wife and I are much less willing to publicly confront our government.


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as bmeeks@xxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/ interesting-people/



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as bobp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/

Note: While you and I might consider this email to be a personal and private communication, you should be aware that its contents, and those of any reply, are liable to be scrutinized by the United States Government in an illegal wiretapping program authorized by President George W. Bush. I suggest you take care not to use inflammatory words or phrases, such as TERRORIST, REVOLUTION, AL QAEDA, ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIST, IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICE, NUCLEAR WEAPON, etc.



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/