<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on Was the 2004 election stolen? No. | Salon.comNews





Begin forwarded message:

From: Steven Hertzberg <stevenstevensteven@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 3, 2006 9:02:15 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "'Randall'" <rvh40@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [IP] more on Was the 2004 election stolen? No. | Salon.comNews

From: Steven Hertzberg <stevenstevensteven@xxxxxxxxx>

The results in Ohio and the Exit Poll have been thoroughly examined.

From: Randall [mailto:rvh40@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Really?  How?  Edison/Mitofsky hasn't released the poll data, have they?
(If they have, Kathy Dopp of USCOUNTVOTES didn't know about it yesterday,
and she tends to keep up with this issue).

<SH> E/M released the Ohio exit poll data only to ESI so that we could
provide an independent analysis of the exit poll result, which we released
at a convention of statisticians in Miami in May 2005.  We were able to
obtain this data without compromising the privacy of the voter, which was the issue preventing the release of the precinct level exit poll data, by
using a technique known as statistical blurring.  Kathy Dopp is aware of
ESI's report.

Steven



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/