[IP] What did Libby know?
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Hitchens, Ralph" <Ralph.Hitchens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: April 14, 2006 10:23:11 AM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: What did Libby know?
Dave, for IP if you wish.
Re. this quote in Ronda's post:
"In that context, defendant proceeded to tell the FBI that he had
merely passed information from one reporter (Russert) to other
reporters while disclaiming any knowledge of whether the information
he passed was true, and certainly unaware that he knew this
classified information from government channels."
This is reaching back to basics with regard to this case. As a card-
carrying member of the Loyal Opposition I've certainly experienced
schadenfreude over the legal troubles of high-level WH staffers, but
I admit to "reasonable doubt" about whether Libby's disclaimer is
indeed a falsehood. I spent 20 years in the intelligence community,
including a few years detailed to the Agency, and learned early on
that there are two types of CIA employees: those in cover status,
and those not. The former, including many who worked in "open," non-
covert jobs like Ms. Plame's at WINPAC, were identified with an
alphabetical suffix after their names in various internal documents
-- rosters, lists of attendees at interagency meetings, and the
like. We all knew when we saw a specific letter after someone's name
that his/her identity was to be protected. But I don't have any idea
how far such knowledge extended. Since Joseph Wilson had worked at
the NSC, there was undoubtedly an awareness among many people in and
around the White House that his wife worked at CIA, but how many of
these people would have known that she was in cover status? And how
likely is it that high-level intelligence "consumers" such as Libby
and his boss would have known this fact? The law in question only
extends to people in cover status, I believe. I have no qualms about
mentioning to anyone the names of some CIA acquaintances, like my
techno-visionary friend Carol Dumaine (star of a Washington Post op-
ed piece not all that long ago) or ex-analyst turned sausage maker
Stan Feder (recently profiled in the Food Section of the Post), but
there are others I came to know whose names always appeared with that
particular suffix and will therefore not be mentioned. It's one
thing to know the law, but another to know to whom the protection
afforded by that law extends.
Ralph Hitchens
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/