[IP] more on for californians AB 2231 Emergency alerts
Begin forwarded message:
From: David Boyes <dboyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: March 31, 2006 4:00:19 PM EST
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx, ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [IP] more on for californians AB 2231 Emergency alerts
From: Jay Goodman Tamboli <jay@xxxxxxxxxx>
What's happened in DC, and what I think is probably a better
solution, is that the government has set up essentially a mailing
list. You sign up for the types of events you want to hear about and
the neighborhoods you're interested in, and you give your email
address or SMS number. When something comes up, you get a message.
I think it's a different problem, though. What I think the California
bill does is require the cellular providers to be able to push
notifications to any IMEI that is registered with any carrier within a
certain geographic scope, regardless of opt-in/opt-out, for use in
emergency situations like bad weather, disasters. Nextel/Clearnet and
other Canadian cell providers have had this for years for their
operations, allowing the RCMP to target severe storm warnings to
travelers in specific areas during winter. It really works well, and
the access to the system is strictly limited to public safety issues.
The providers bear the cost/burden as a PR thing.
I
don't know what the cost is to the government, but it seems to me
this kind of thing (widely publicized) accomplishes the same thing,
and it has the advantage of letting people not opt-in if they're not
interested.
I think the point is NOT to miss anyone in a specific area. It's like
air-raid klaxons -- everybody hears it. The voluntary bit makes it less
useful if you can't be sure that everyone is the message.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/