<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] DNA may tell police the surname of the criminal




-------- Original Message --------
Subject: DNA may tell police the surname of the criminal
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:09:16 +0000
From: Brian Randell <Brian.Randell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx

Hi Dave:

>From today's (UK) Guardian:


>How DNA may tell police the surname of the criminal
>
>Alok Jha
>Wednesday February 22, 2006
>The Guardian
>
>Police will soon be able to predict the surnames of criminals whose 
>DNA is found at crime scenes, according to research published 
>yesterday. The technique would only work in finding men, however, as 
>it is based on identifying similarities in the Y chromosome, which 
>is passed from father to son.
>
>The technique relies on research carried out by University of 
>Leicester scientists into how Y chromosomes have spread through the 
>British population. They analysed these chromosomes in 150 pairs of 
>men with the same surname and found that, in a quarter of cases, the 
>pair had matching Y chromosomes.
>
>When the most common names were excluded from the list - Smith, 
>Jones, Williams and Taylor, for example - the chance that two men 
>with the same surname shared a Y chromosome jumped to 50%. The 
>research appears in the latest edition of Current Biology.
>
>Mark Jobling, a geneticist at the University of Leicester who led 
>the work, said the police would need a relatively small collection 
>of male DNA - around 40,000 people - to allow useful matches to be 
>made. "That sounds big but the national DNA database is nearly 100 
>times bigger," he said. By matching the Y chromosome details of 
>unidentified DNA at a crime scene with the database, police would 
>get a list of potential surname matches.
>
>"That would allow you to prioritise suspects in your investigation," 
>said Dr Jobling. "If you have a lot of suspects - say a whole town 
>or something - you can say we have 50 names, are these names 
>represented here, if so let's go and interview these people."
>
>Y chromosomes are passed from father to son mostly unaltered. Once 
>in a while, they will acquire random mutations as they pass through 
>the generations. Some parts of the chromosome are known to mutate 
>less rapidly than others and, by mapping these differences, 
>scientists can create a tree showing the relationships between 
>different Y chromosomes.
>
>"If men fall in different branches of the tree, there's no way they 
>can be related to a recent male ancestor," said Dr Jobling. "If they 
>lie within the same branch, there is a chance they are, but it 
>doesn't prove it.
>
>"When we do that simple test, we find that a highly statistically 
>significant excess of pairs share a branch of the tree, much more 
>than we expect by chance."
>
>It is a surprising result, since there are plenty of reasons why 
>people might have the same surname but be unrelated: many names were 
>founded by more than one man, for example. There is also the issue 
>of illegitimacy. The researchers predicted that more than 1% of 
>children were illegitimate in each generation. Over many 
>generations, this could have built up a significant error.
>
>"Those two elements would act as a strong force to break any links," 
>said Dr Jobling. "It was a surprise that by choosing just pairs we 
>got a clear signal of sharing ancestors."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/crime/article/0,,1715022,00.html




-- 
School of Computing Science, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne,
NE1 7RU, UK
EMAIL = Brian.Randell@xxxxxxxxx   PHONE = +44 191 222 7923
FAX = +44 191 222 8232  URL = http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/~brian.randell/

-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/