[IP] Net Neutrality - Tragedy of the Commons
Begin forwarded message:
From: Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: February 20, 2006 4:42:24 PM EST
To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Net Neutrality - Tragedy of the Commons
Reply-To: dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Note: This is someone's take on the fiber usage in Japan study that
I posted earlier. DLH]
Net Neutrality - Tragedy of the Commons
Published February 20th, 2006 in Carriers, FTTH, Regulation
<http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2006/02/20/net-neutrality-tragedy-of-
the-commons/>
The New York Times writes an editorial on Net Neutrality, thereby
launching the issue into the mainstream. In typical Left leaning
fashion, the NYT comes out for government regulation of ISPs, and
argues that consumers should be guaranteed service regardless of
application.
Net neutrality is about big media against big telecom, not big
telecom against the consumer, though that is not what the NYT and
digital elitists would like you to believe. The reality is that
different types of internet consumers exist, and they should pay
different amounts for different types of service. Just as the Tragedy
of the Commons parable shows:
Benefits of exploitation accrue to individuals, while the costs of
exploitation are distributed between all those exploiting the resource.
The telcos have done an awful job of arguing for net neutrality, and
have caused such an uproar that Congress cannot back away without
extracting a pound of flesh. One of the more sensible things Verizon
(VZ) or AT&T (T”) could have presented at the congressional hearings
is some recent insightful data ( .pdf link ) on internet use in
Japan, where high-bandwidth services are most deployed.
[snip]
Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/