[IP] More on Blog Buzz on High-Tech Start-Ups Causes ,> Some Static
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> From: David S. Isenberg <isen@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: February 10, 2006 11:39:13 AM EST
> To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: More on Re: [IP] Blog Buzz on High-Tech Start-Ups Causes
> Some Static
>
> Dave,
>
> For IP per judgement of Editor:
>
> I am on FON's USA Advisory Board and I think WSJ Reporter Rebecca
> Buckman, the WSJ reporter who wrote the story took mainstream
> reporting to new lows. I was interviewed by Buckman and a subject of
> her FON story. I have never felt more abused in an interview with
> a reporter in my eight years talking to the press than I did with
> her. She asked me the same questions over and over like she was
> badgering a hostile witness, even after I answered her in a
> complete, frank, transparent and detailed way. It felt to me
> like she had an agenda. It did not feel like she had honest
> curiosity to learn the facts.
>
> And I am really pi^H^H angry that Ms. Buckman's story compared the
> FON advisory board to Armstrong Williams and other paid political
> propaganda flacks. Read the WSJ story carefully, ignoring the
> innuendo, and you will see Buckman turned up ZERO evidence of
> anything but frank disclosure among us foneros.
>
> Fact: Every FON advisor who blogged the FON announcement
> disclosed their advisory relationship. Reporter Buckman took
> us to task for not saying explicitly that we were compensated
> as advisors. In fact, technically, we are NOT compensated, as
> no written agreement is in place, just a nonspecific verbal
> intent. We don't know if we're getting warrants or options
> or stock. We don't know how much. We don't know the terms.
> We trust FON founder Varsavsky to figure out something fair
> because he is our friend. Plus, if you say, "I work for
> (consult for, advise) foobar, inc.", doesn't that imply
> you've got some kind of quid pro quo going?
>
> More importantly, just about every FON advisor who blogged
> the announcement expressed some kind of heartfelt skepticism
> or doubt about the FON launch. It was very fast, very untested,
> and a pretty risky thing to do so early. We told Varsavsky
> our concerns in confidence before the USA launch, and we told
> the world after the launch. If that's paid publicity, he should
> hire more compliant lackeys.
>
> I blogged it here:
> http://isen.com/blog/2006/02/blogging-conflict-of-interest-and.html
> FON advisor David Weinberger blogged it here
> http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/
> wsj_on_fon_disclosure_and_my_f.html
> Here's Varsavsky's blog posting:
> http://english.martinvarsavsky.net/fon/a-dream-come-true.html
> Here's the made-up-news WSJ Buckman story
> http://tinyurl.com/9pam5
> Here's FON advisor Ethan Zuckerman's very different take
> http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/?p=368
> Here's FON advisor Rebecca MacKinnon's take
> http://rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/2006/02/
> the_revolution_.html
>
> 'nuf said. In my mind, this thread is closed. FON has more important
> things to think about.
> David I
> -------
>
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2006, at 2:30 PM, Dave Farber wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Blog Buzz on High-Tech Start-Ups Causes Some Static
>> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:18:42 -0500
>> From: Seth Finkelstein <sethf@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Dave Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ip Ip <ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Blog Buzz on High-Tech Start-Ups Causes Some Static
>> http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB113945389770169170.html
>>
>> "But the tiny company [FON] also got publicity from another source:
>> influential commentators on the Internet who write blogs --
>> including
>> some who may be compensated in the future for advising FON about its
>> business.
>> ...
>> The avalanche of blogging about FON, much of it from people now tied
>> to the four-month-old company, highlights the rising influence of
>> blogs in shaping opinions about tech start-ups, particularly in
>> Silicon Valley. It also reveals the possible conflicts of interest
>> such complicated relationships can dredge up."
>>
>> --
>> Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer http://sethf.com
>> Infothought blog - http://sethf.com/infothought/blog/
>> Interview: http://sethf.com/essays/major/greplaw-interview.php
>>
>> -------------------------------------
>> You are subscribed as isen@xxxxxxxxx
>> To manage your subscription, go to
>> http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
>>
>> Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/
>> interesting-people/
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD70DXh0VyAToQeqERAuIAAKCwqB888yB8YRLuhHUAs+n8oLxqsACfSmwl
UngeTjYpXdCKws3tlGCfgBU=
=khC5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/