<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] Re: Bush Proposes Tax on WiFi]





-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        [Dewayne-Net] Re: Bush Proposes Tax on WiFi
Date:   Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:33:27 -0800
From:   Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To:       dewayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To:     Dewayne-Net Technology List <dewayne-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:     <1139317651.43e89b9336bce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



[Note: I'm cross posting this from another list. I haven't seen another source run the same content as the RCR story, so Harold may have a point. DLH]

From: Harold Feld <hfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: February 7, 2006 5:07:31 AM PST
To: Robert Horvitz <horvitz@xxxxxx>
Cc: ipolicy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openspectrum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, unlicensed_advocates@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Openspectrum] Re: [Unlicensed_advocates] Bush proposes tax on Wi-Fi, unlicensed spectrum

PLEASE STAMP OUT THIS URBAN RUMOR BEFORE IT SPREADS!

Not that I blame Robert, but I wish reporters would read things a little more
carefully.

Ribbono d'almah kulah, the modem tax of the 21st Century.

The President's budget message explicitly refers to unauctioned LICENSED spectrum. Nor does it impose a tax or fee, but authorize the FCC to do so.

This is an anual event here in the U.S. The administration has wanted to impose spectrum user fees on broadcasters. This has a snowball's chance on Mercury of passing. So this year, instead of saying "broadcasters" it included all users of unauctioned licensed spectrum, with a justification that a user fee will cause the licensee to internalize the cost of not using the spectrum and spur the licensee to maximize the value of the resource. Because, as we all know, maximizing economic value MUST BE the highest best use of spectrum. Just ask
any fireman.

Now, dependng on how it actually got drafted, it COULD give the FCC authority to impose some kind of user fee on "unlicensed" spectrum. This would very much
depend on actual statutory language.

Harold

Quoting Robert Horvitz <horvitz@xxxxxx>:

http://rcrnews.com/news.cms?newsId=25545

by Jeffrey Silva, RCR Wireless News, 6 February:

"The proposal, contained in the president's 2007 budget plan and
projected to raise $3.6 billion during the decade, is believed to
be aimed at unlicensed frequencies used for Wi-Fi and other
applications. It's unclear whether the 'user fee' tax would be paid
by equipment vendors or end users.

" 'Spectrum assignment policy has not kept pace with the changing
market. Service providers using different technologies to deliver a
similar product can face different spectrum license acquisition
costs,' the budget stated. 'The lack of parity in spectrum
assignment creates incentives that can diminish the overall utility
of the spectrum...' "
--
Harold Feld
Senior Vice President
Media Access Project

Weblog at: <http://weblog.warpspeed.com>


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/