<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] corrected url CA is not recertifying Diebold voting machines





Begin forwarded message:

From: Elaine Newton <enewton@xxxxxxx>
Date: January 24, 2006 1:52:13 PM EST
To: "Bernard A. Galler" <galler@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] CA is not recertifying Diebold voting machines

It's here:
http://www.fcw.com/article91787-12-21-05-Web

Sorry for the old-ish news.  It somehow missed me over the holidays.

E


** Are you sure that the URL below is right? I get an entirely different
article displayed. Bernie


-----Original Message----- From: Elaine Newton [mailto:enewton@xxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:25 AM To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: CA
is not recertifying Diebold voting machines

For IP if you wish,

Calif. refuses to recertify Diebold voting machines The secretary of
state has put the company's application on hold until Diebold submits
its source code for additional testing.
http://newsletters.101com.com/c.asp?id=598627&l=14&c=080c6bfbc9186f5a


from State & Local IT News Highlights January 24, 2006 http:// www.fcw.com/




------------------------------------- You are subscribed as
galler@xxxxxxxxx To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


--

Bernard A. Galler 734-668-8152 fax 734-668-9998





-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/