From: David Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [IP] more on Supreme Court Lets University Block Spam
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:07 -0500
To: ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2)
Reply-To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
List-ID: <ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Software: listbox.com v2.0
List-Help: <http://v2.listbox.com/doc/help_sub?
list_name=ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:subscribe-ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <http://
v2.listbox.com/subscribe/?listname=ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:unsubscribe-ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <http://
v2.listbox.com/member/unsubscribe/?listname=ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Begin forwarded message:
From: Gerald Shifrin <gerald.shifrin@xxxxxxx>
Date: January 12, 2006 6:20:52 PM EST
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [IP] Supreme Court Lets University Block Spam
Isn't there any concern that the dating service legally obtained the
student's email address from the university?
I wonder what other information was "legally" distributed?
-----Original Message-----
From: David Farber [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:44 PM
To: ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [IP] Supreme Court Lets University Block Spam
Begin forwarded message:
From: Randall <rvh40@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: January 12, 2006 6:30:25 AM EST
To: Dave <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>, cyberia <CYBERIA-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Supreme Court Lets University Block Spam
http://htdaw.blogsource.com/post.mhtml?post_id=182235
Court Lets University of Texas Block Spam
Thursday, January 12, 2006 at 6:26 AM EST
Court Lets Univ. of Texas Block Spam
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to intervene in a dispute
between the University of Texas and an online dating service upset
that
the school blocked thousands of unsolicited e-mails.
The high court let stand a federal appeals court's ruling that UT did
not violate the constitutional rights of White Buffalo Ventures
when it
blocked 59,000 e-mails in 2003.
White Buffalo Ventures, which operates LonghornSingles.com, said it
had
complied with all anti-spam laws and argued that a federal act that
allows certain e-mails superseded the university's anti-spam policy.
A 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled in August that the
federal anti-spam law, CAN-SPAM, does not pre-empt the university's
policy and that the policy is permissible under the First Amendment.
The Austin-based service had legally obtained the addresses from the
university, but the university started blocking the e-mail messages
saying White Buffalo was part of a larger spam problem that had
crashed
the computer system.
The university said it was also responding to complaints from students
and faculty.
At the time, UT issued a cease and desist order, but White Buffalo
refused to comply. So UT blocked all the e-mail messages from White
Buffalo's IP address.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060109/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_dating_spam
--
"We've got the hatemongers who literally hate this president, and that
is so wrong. . . . The people who hate George Bush hate him because
he's
a follower of Jesus Christ, unashamedly says so and applies his
faith in
his day-to-day operations." -- Rev. Jerry Falwell, on C-SPAN's
"Washington Journal"
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as gerald.shifrin@xxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/
interesting- people/
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as updegrove@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-
people/