<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] Cellphone 911 calls failed in big storm: Prudence





Begin forwarded message:

From: Liz Ditz <ponytrax@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: December 22, 2005 11:19:16 AM EST
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] Cellphone 911 calls failed in big storm: Prudence

Dave, E911 is all well and good, but a prudent person has a backup plan.

I live and travel about in Silicon Valley, which has a patchwork of emergency responders. In my car (and more importantly, my teen daughter's car) I keep a list of the direct numbers for emergency dispatch for the various municipalities we travel through. I've also programmed in the direct number for EMS dispatch for the stable where she rides her horse, so if she's in an accident, or witnesses one, help can be summoned quickly. (I learned this the hard way, as 911 dispatch was very slow to arrive to an equestrian accident as the dispatcher was unfamiliar with the location of the stable.)

If any of your readers are (for example) mountain bikers, putting on speed-dial the direct EMS dispatch number for the trails they frequent is a good idea.


**********
Liz Ditz
ponytrax@xxxxxxxxxx

blog: http://lizditz.typepad.com

Success: fall down seven times, stand up eight.

On Dec 22, 2005, at 2:48 AM, David Farber wrote:



Begin forwarded message:

From: Monty Solomon <monty@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: December 21, 2005 11:15:26 PM EST
To: undisclosed-recipient:;
Subject: Cellphone 911 calls failed in big storm / Verizon promises to ferret out why system broke down


Cellphone 911 calls failed in big storm
Verizon promises to ferret out why system broke down

By Douglas Belkin, Globe Staff  |  December 21, 2005

At the height of a blinding afternoon snowstorm almost two weeks ago,
the state's enhanced 911 cellphone system failed, leaving motorists
stuck on highways unable to reach police easily.

State authorities said the glitch, which appears to have been in the
Verizon network that routes all cell 911 calls, lasted as long as 40
minutes. The result: Users who called 911 around 3 p.m. on Dec. 9
heard only a busy signal.

''Something jammed the system. The calls never got through," said
Edward M. Merrick Jr., the chairman of the standards committee for
the Statewide Emergency Telecommunications Board, which oversees the
system. ''It's a serious concern."

The breakdown coincided with a Northeaster that barrelled across
Massachusetts, icing roads, crippling traffic, and decreasing
visibility to just a few feet. Parts of the state received 15 inches
of snow and experienced wind gusts of up to 70 miles per hour.

The hour before the storm hit, the State Police enhanced 911 center
in Framingham answered about 500 calls. But between 3 p.m. and 4
p.m., operators received fewer than 200. It is not clear how many
calls failed, but it appears a switch that controls which cell calls
enter the 911 system was overwhelmed and shut down. Land-line calls
still went through.

Merrick was aware that call volume had lessened during the storm, but
until he was contacted by the Globe, he attributed it to not having
enough operators on duty. It was only after some inquiries, and 10
days after the storm, that Merrick learned the problem may have been
on Verizon's end.

...

http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2005/12/21/ cellphone_911_calls_failed_in_big_storm/



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as ponytrax@xxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/




-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/