Begin forwarded message: From: DV Henkel-Wallace <gumby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: November 30, 2005 8:09:26 PM EST To: Kris Gabor <kgabor@xxxxxxx> Cc: David Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>, rms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [IP] Getting consumers' consent to sell cellphone tracking data
Your message skips the crux of the matter: what's their incentive to keep it anonymous? How is it that nobody ever implements an anonymous automotive toll system (e.g. FASTRAK here in the bay area) even though it's _less_ effort?
And in the specific case of mobile phones, the carriers have yet to exhibit even a shred of concern for their customer's interest.
From: Kris Gabor <kgabor@xxxxxxx> Date: November 30, 2005 4:18:13 PM EST Interesting debate. I don't see the big deal here, though. A lot ofvaluable information can be gleaned from using cell phones as anonymous mobile transponders. The key is that the wireless carriers not pass on anypersonally identifiable information
------------------------------------- You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/