[IP] more on SBC to raise DSL pricing 25-43% (unless you bundle)
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jim Thompson <jim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: November 1, 2005 7:00:19 AM EST
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Bob19-0501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] more on SBC to raise DSL pricing 25-43% (unless you
bundle)
On Nov 1, 2005, at 1:35 AM, David Farber wrote:
Of course PPPoE is a strange thing -- it's based on some confused
model of
the Internet. You run IP over ATM backhauled to some remote place
where it
is then connected to the Internet via an ISP of your choice. In
addition to
the physical billing channels, it's about virtual billing channels.
You
can't let those packets roam free -- that would be too simple.
Its weird, but the "common carrier" status of the Bells drove this.
They have to be able to direct your traffic to the "long distance
provider of choice".
Yes, just like LD POTS.
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/