<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on Thinking the unthinkable, predicting the unpredictable





Begin forwarded message:

From: "Hitchens, Ralph" <Ralph.Hitchens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: September 19, 2005 11:20:52 AM EDT
To: "'dave@xxxxxxxxxx'" <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [IP] Thinking the unthinkable, predicting the unpredictable


Dave, for IP if you like.

Richard Wiggins asks exactly the right question. In the Intelligence Community, inductive reasoning dominates -- those in possession of the most facts, who have "sipped from the tsunami" of all-source information, dominate the interagency discussions where policy support is hammered out. They write the PDBs. But as we all saw in the declassified PDB of August 6th, 2001, it's not enough to put a lot of barely-connected facts out there nothing more than with a vague, nonspecific conclusion. A lead paragraph announcing that Bin Ladin has been planning to attack the US for more than four years will not prompt the President to change his vacation plans.

Deductive reasoning in the form of scenario-based forecasting is not very much in evidence within the IC. We really do need a "Red Team" or, as Wiggins suggests, a "Department of Thinking Like Terrorists."

Ralph Hitchens

-----Original Message-----
<snip>
Mr. Bray wants to confine any predictions of 9/11 type scenarios to obscure government reports and Tom Clancy.

It is astonishing that we are having this discussion. We have an existence proof! 9/11 did happen. It's therefore foolish on its face to say that "No one could have predicted this."

We don't need to debate whether anyone could have predicted using planes as missiles. Al Qaeda not only predicted it; they conceived it, they planned it, and they executed it. Bray's argument implies that a desperately angry band in Afghanistan can out-think the best and the brightest in U.S. intelligence and defense.

Of course we cannot predict every possible disaster, or, more to the point, we can't predict which of many possible disasters may hit next.


But do we have a "Department of Thinking Like Terrorists" that is at least thinking through the scenarios?

What else is someone plotting that we cannot predict?


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/