<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[IP] more on Santorum: Still Disconnected





Begin forwarded message:

From: Robert Lee <robertslee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: September 9, 2005 8:15:22 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [IP] Santorum: Still Disconnected


The single and pure idea that a government, national or local, should be
prohibited from providing any service that a private enterprise wants to
provide is idiotic.

Let's say I want to start a company that puts out fires.  Should I get a
congressman or city councilman to introduce a law that outlaws cities
from "competing" with me?  I think my business model will be to
negotiate the charge for this service at the time of the fire.  I will
charge X for putting it out within 2 hours, 2X withing 1 hour, and 4X
for leaving immediately.

Free enterprise at work.

What if I want to start a company that does zoning?  Policework?

Santorum is the dumbest senator in Washington.  The National Weather
Service should collect all the data points but refuse to pass them on to
the American public so that a private service can charge them?

There are services that are common good services, that address the basic
welfare of our people.  Police protection, fire extinguishing, weather
forecasting are services that address the basic physical welfare of a
citizenry and anyone who wants to prevent the government from providing
them is a fascist.

If Santorum truly believes in free enterprise and free choice, let him
encourage AccuWeather to convince their customers that their forecasts
are worth paying despite those of the National Weather Service being
free.

The man is a disgrace.



-----Original Message-----
From: David Farber [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 7:38 PM
To: Ip Ip
Subject: [IP] Santorum: Still Disconnected



Begin forwarded message:

From: "Kevin G. Barkes" <kgb@xxxxxxx>
Date: September 9, 2005 7:23:10 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Santorum: Still Disconnected
Reply-To: kgbarkes@xxxxxxxxx


Union criticizes Santorum remarks about Katrina forecast

SEAN D. HAMILL

Associated Press

PITTSBURGH - The National Weather Service Employees union on Friday said
U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum should retract statements this week questioning
whether the weather service had given sufficient warning of Hurricane
Katrina's path and fury.

"There's nobody else in the country saying the weather service didn't
do a
stellar job," said Dan Sobien, a meteorologist in Tampa, Fla., and vice
president of the union.

Union president Paul Greaves accused the third-ranking Senate
Republican of
trying to further his goal of limiting the weather service's role in
favor
of private companies, such as Pennsylvania-based AccuWeather.

"We know Sen. Santorum is looking out for the interests of his
constituents
in Pennsylvania," said Greaves, a meteorologist in Albany, NY, "and
one of
those constituents is AccuWeather."

During an interview Thursday with WITF Public Radio in Harrisburg,
Santorum,
R-Pa., said, in part, that "the weather service gave no warning, or not
sufficient warning in my opinion, as to the effects when it came on
land in
Florida as a Category One hurricane."

"Predictions were that it wasn't going to go out to the gulf and
affect the
western gulf coast, it was going to sort of head up to Florida or go
right
off the coast of Florida."

"I'm not going to suggest when it comes to Katrina that there were
any major
errors," he went on to say in the same interview. "I don't know. This is
something that I think needs to be investigated."

Following the union's criticism, Santorum released a statement Friday
saying
that "I hope as we go forward to review the various aspects related to
Hurricane Katrina that we also look at whether the forecasts and
warnings
provided the necessary information to preserve lives and property."

But a fellow Republican senator, Jim DeMint of South Carolina,
praised the
weather service's performance, calling it in a statement Friday "one
of the
most accurate hurricane predictions we have ever seen." Spokesman Wesley
Denton said DeMint was unaware of Santorum's comments or the union's
response.

DeMint cited the same documents referred to by Greaves and Sobien
indicating
that 2 1/2 days before Katrina hit New Orleans, the agency had
accurately
predicted it would hit there. "These early and accurate forecasts saved
countless lives along the Gulf Coast," DeMint said.

Earlier this year, Santorum introduced legislation that would limit what
information the weather service, a federal agency, could provide to the
public. He said the agency should focus on "severe weather forecasts and
warnings designed for the protection of life and property," and leave
the
day-to-day predictions to private companies like AccuWeather, a point he
made in Thursday's interview.

On Tuesday, Democrat Bob Casey Jr., who is widely expected to challenge
Santorum next year, criticized the senator's comment that people who
didn't
heed future evacuation warnings may need to be penalized if they had the
ability to leave an area.

On Friday, Santorum said in an interview that he didn't know exactly
what
kind of penalties could be put in place.

"We have to somehow or another give local authorities some teeth for
evacuation purposes," he said. "I know people who choose to stay
behind can
put themselves and the general public at risk."


Regards,

KGB

-----
Kevin G. Barkes
Email: kgb@xxxxxxx | Web: www.kgb.com
KGB Report:
http://www.kgb.com
Commentwear by KGB:
http://www.commentwear.com
National Temperature Index:
http://nationaltemperatureindex.com
DCL Dialogue on line:
http://www.kgb.com/dcl.html
Random Quotations Generator:
http://www.goodquotations.com
Over 12,000 searchable quotations.



-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as robertslee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/




-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/