[IP] more on FCC rules that telcos can cut off DSL resellers
Begin forwarded message:
From: Joe McGuckin <joe@xxxxxxx>
Date: August 7, 2005 9:12:52 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx, Ip Ip <ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IP] FCC rules that telcos can cut off DSL resellers
(For IP )
Brett,
Is this another 'the sky is falling' warning?
I've been hearing for years about how the telcos are going to crush
independent ISP's, yet small ISP's seem to be thriving. Yes, if you
try to
complete directly against an ILEC such as SBC, you're going to get
squashed.
You cannot beat the ILEC on price, service availability or install lead
times. Did I mention price?
I know the president of a large DSL reseller here in California. Even
though
they are probably one of the SBC's top 10 dsl resellers, he mentioned
to me
that after adding in the various costs imposed on them by the SBC for
access
to the DSL network and fees for accessing DSLAMS and CO's, their cost
per
subscriber was higher then the SBC's retail street price. They have to
compete on selling a 'better' product, but the sad fact is that
consumers
generally buy the cheapest product - and the ILEC will always be able to
sell it cheaper than any of their resellers.
Every bill received by a SBC telephone customer is a pitch for their
data
services. Every time a subscriber talks to the SBC customer service,
there's
a pitch to combine or consolidate services to save money. Three months
before a resale customer's contract is up, they're being cold-called by
SBC's telemarketers to switch over direct to SBC.
DSL is a lost cause - as T1's will be. Any service that remotely
resembles a
commodity and where the underlying access is controlled by an ILEC will
eventually be price-pointed below profitability for the non-
facilities based
ISP.
As far as backhauls go: Except for very rare circumstances, ILECS are
already the most expensive option for circuits. Any ISP with any
sense will
have moved their gear into network neutral colo with a wide selection of
carriers in order to guarantee themselves reasonable pricing.
I don't think the independent ISP's are endangered, you just have to
sell
against the ILEC's weaknesses, not their strengths.
Joe
On 8/6/05 4:25 PM, "David Farber" <dave@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Brett Glass <brett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: August 6, 2005 4:35:03 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx, Ip Ip <ip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IP] FCC rules that telcos can cut off DSL resellers
Dave:
The most serious problem with this ruling is that it may not only cut
off local providers' access to the DSL infrastructure but also their
"backhauls" -- their connections to the Internet. The ruling will
allow the Baby Bells to price wholesale access (the "big pipes" that
ISPs buy) above the retail value that can be derived from them, thus
making it infeasible for others to compete and ensuring vertical
integration. The days of the independent ISP may well be numbered.
--Brett Glass
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as joe@xxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-
people/
--
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
994 San Antonio Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Phone: 650-213-1302
Cell: 650-207-0372
Fax: 650-969-2124
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/