[IP] How Martin's FCC is different from Powell's
Begin forwarded message:
From: "David S. Isenberg" <isen@xxxxxxxx>
Date: August 7, 2005 6:28:24 PM EDT
To: David Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fwd: [isen.blog] How Martin's FCC is different from Powell's
Dave,
For IP, per your judgement:
The difference between the Powell FCC and the Martin FCC (.doc, .pdf)
is clear in the FCC's re-statement of Powell's Four Internet Freedoms
issued Friday!
Powell: Freedom to access content.
Martin: Consumers are entitled to access the lawful Internet
content of
their choice.
Powell: Freedom to run applications.
Martin: Consumers are entitled to run applications and services of
their
choice, subject to the needs of law enforcement;
Powell: Freedom to attach devices.
Martin: Consumers are entitled to connect their choice of legal
devices
that do not harm the network.
Powell: Freedom to obtain service plan information.
Martin: Consumers are entitled to competition among network providers,
application and service providers, and content providers.
And the Martin FCC adds an important footnote:
All of these principles are subject to reasonable network management.
To Powell, the Internet affords freedoms.
To Martin, the Internet provides not freedoms, but rather
"entitlements" to "consumers."
To Powell, the freedoms are general.
To Martin, there's an unspoken bias whereby non-consumers (supra-
consumers?) are subject to different entitlements.
To Powell, the freedoms are absolute.
To Martin, the presumption is that illegal uses are likely; law
enforcement trumps "consumer" "entitlement" in all cases. The
Internet has no presumption of innocence.
To Powell, service plan information should exist in the disinfecting
light of day.
To Martin, "consumers" need not bother their pretty little heads
about service plan information; as long as there's
"competition" (defined as one or more "competitors"(?)), all's right
with the world.
Oh, and to Martin, there's a gathering danger that "consumer"
"entitlements" might "harm the network" or depart from "reasonable
network management."
Also see Susan Crawford's excellent analysis at
http://scrawford.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2005/8/5/1111877.html
Technorati Tags: F2C, FCC, KevinMartin
--
Posted by isen to isen.blog at 8/07/2005 05:07:31 PM
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/