[IP] more on TSA Violated Law, GAO Finds - illustrates a WIDEspread problem!
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jim Warren <jwarren@xxxxxxxx>
Date: July 23, 2005 3:00:44 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IP] TSA Violated Law, GAO Finds - illustrates a
WIDEspread problem!
At 5:59 PM -0400 7/22/05, David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: prsingel <prsingel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
...
TSA employeess did indeed violate a federal privacy law when they
secretly expanded the nature and extent of testing of a new passenger
screening system, according to congressional investigators.
...
This, in fact, illustrates a WIDEspread problem, in all levels of
government. It works like this:
1. An enforcement agency pleads that they need more powers/latitude/
authority etc., in order to protect innocent citizens / do their
job / etc.
2. The legislative body grants them their wishes, but with limits
and prohibitions on how those new (or current!) powers can be
exploited by the agency.
3. The enforcement agency -- as an administrative decision, or by
[some of] its officials acting as "rogue agents" -- exceeds those
powers and their authority ... sometimes grossly exceeding it.
4. The legislative body is [sometimes] "outraged", at least when
it's sufficiently embarrassing, and it's elected members posture and
whine and cry "helpless" crocodile tears about such administrative
"excesses".
BUT ...
It is the legislative body that is at FAULT! Why?
Almost invariably, when they grant new powers and impose new
limitations, legislators FAIL to, at the same time, specify any
PENALTIES -- especially CRIMINAL penalties -- for any agents,
officials, administrators, etc., who violate their legislated
prohibitions.
I.e., the legislators specify limitations and prohibitions, but
commonly do NOT specify any penalties if their limitations and
prohibitions are ignored or violated!
Can you imagine the same legislators enacting prohibitions or
mandates on PRIVATE citizens -- who are NOT part of their too-cozy
government -- without ALSO taking great care to, at the same time,
enact penalties ... civil and/or criminal ... for CITIZENS who
violate those prohibitions and mandates?!
Solution: EVERY time a legislative body -- local, state or federal
-- proposes to enact some limitation or mandate, EVEN if it's on
<gasp> other government officials and agencies, they should (must!)
ALSO, at the same time, as part of the same legislation, ALWAYS enact/
include PENALTIES to be imposed if [when] government agents violate
the enacted limits/prohibitions.
And since violations are by officials acting under "color of
authority" -- acting on behalf of that very legislative body -- who
violate their prohibitions, the penalties should be MANDATORY.
(Let's not give the administrative branch the freedom to decide
whether it will prosecute itself!)
Doing anything less simply INVITES and ENCOURAGES "over-zealous"
agents and "well-meaning" officials to IGNORE the law's toothless
limits, and do whatever they damn-well please. (I.e., the much-
vaunted "rule of law" only applies to citizens; not government
officials!)
--jim
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/