[IP] more on In-flight cellphone proposal hits static [rewritten]
If this is true why do they allow inflight phones
Begin forwarded message:
From: Charles Pinneo <pinneo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 16, 2005 11:12:44 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Bob Frankston <rmf31a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IP] In-flight cellphone proposal hits static [rewritten]
Common sense says that the real reason cell phones are banned is that
people are seated very close together. Therefore it becomes even more
obnoxious.
Charlie Pinneo
pinneo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------
On Jun 16, 2005, at 8:20 PM, David Farber wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Bob Frankston <rmf31a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 16, 2005 5:16:42 PM EDT
To: Dave Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: In-flight cellphone proposal hits static [rewritten]
Personally the cell phone ban in itself is not a pressing issue
because my orifice (Verizon) forwards my cell calls to the plan and
also gives me discounted usage. What’s important is that the FCC is
admitting (even if with some comments about needing research) that
the ban on cell phones was based on hunches and superstition. Not
only that, it compounded the myth to the point that I sometimes am
told I must shut off my camera because it is digital
Notice who this attract “add-on” social policy because “we all
know” that cell phone users are obnoxious..
From the story: Gayle James doesn't want the Federal Communications
Commission to lift its in-flight ban on cellphones in airplanes,
and here's why:
''I was seated next to a very loud man who was explaining his next
porn movie on his cellphone," wrote James, of Shelton, Wash.
''Everyone on that plane was subjected to his explicit blabbering.
Should cell use during flight be allowed, we had all better be
prepared for a whole lot of air rage going on."
Maybe the real reason for keeping the ban is that they can’t afford
to remove all those “No PED” (personal electronic devices) that
they installed because everyone knows that cell phones make planes
crash. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing – a lot of
superstition and stereotyping is even worse.
I’ve been though this before when trying to give my wife directions
to a family gathering. I was told that I was one of those obnoxious
people who showed off by using cell phones. When the clueless rule
those with a clue are heretics who must be punished.
Even though the plane isn’t necessarily a “first amendment” zone,
this is yet another reminder of how easy it is use a “just so”
story as a cover for acting on ones fear and use it as an excuse
for imposing them on others.
____________________________________________________________
The following appeared on Boston.com:
Headline: In-flight cellphone proposal hits static
Date: June 16, 2005
"Gayle James doesn't want the Federal Communications Commission to
lift its in-flight ban on cellphones in airplanes, and here's why:"
____________________________________________________________
To see this recommendation, click on the link below or cut and
paste it
into a Web browser:
http://www.boston.com:80/business/globe/articles/2005/06/16/
in_flight_cellphone_proposal_hits_static
____________________________________________________________
This message was sent by Bob Frankston
[mailto:Globe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
through Boston.com's email recommendation service. If you have
questions
or comments about this free service, please email us at
feedback@xxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as [USER_EMAIL]
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-
people/
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as [USER_EMAIL]
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/