[IP] more on Desecration of flag is crime amendment to constitution may pass both houses. Democrats afraid to oppose.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Chris Beck <cbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 15, 2005 11:09:17 PM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx, John Lyon <jelyon@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IP] more on Desecration of flag is crime amendment to
constitution may pass both houses. Democrats afraid to oppose.
Rumour has it David Farber, on or about 15/06/2005 4:19 PM, whispered:
Again, I ask: How can giving money to political entities be
politically
protected speech, while burning the flag is not?]
Well it's obvious isn't it? Einstein said it first: it's all relative.
"Protection" is relative to who is doing the protecting. You are
obviously
using some archaic definition of protected where it actually had a
universal
application.
I await the videos eagerly. May I suggest "Land of Hope & Glory" as
the sound
track? Preferrably a copyrighted version.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Beck - http://pacanukeha.blogspot.com
A small amount of power also corrupts absolutely
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/