[IP] A battle for the soul of the Internet
Begin forwarded message:
From: George Sadowsky <george.sadowsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 6, 2005 11:13:29 AM EDT
To: dave@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: A battle for the soul of the Internet
Dave - possibly for IP? The deadline for submissions of interest for
ICANN leadership positions is currently mid-June, and we are looking
hard for good candidates. Elliot Noss is a member of the ICANN
Nominating Committee that I chair.
George
[1]http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-5730589.html
A battle for the soul of the Internet
By Elliot Noss, Special to ZDNet
Published on ZDNet News: June 3, 2005, 5:19 AM PT
With little fanfare, there is a battle going on for the soul of the
Internet. The United Nations and the [2]ITU (International
Communications Union) are trying to wrest control of domain
names, the
DNS and IP addresses from [3]ICANN (Internet Corporation for
Assigned
Names and Numbers). This battle manifests itself through the
U.N.-created [4]World Summit on Information Society (WSIS) and the
ITU-lead [5]Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG).
While the Internet is essentially a series of protocols adhered
to by
common consent, it relies on a single authoritative root at its
core.
This is what assures Internet users who type "zdnet.com" into their
browsers that they end up where they thought they should.
Anything but
uniqueness with this vital resource would result in collision and
confusion. The same is true for e-mail. Unless senders are certain
that there is only one unique identifier for a recipient, they
cannot
use e-mail with confidence.
Both the U.N. and the ITU have their reasons for trying to wrest
control of these vital resources from ICANN. For the U.N., ICANN
represents a body that transcends the nation-state structure, and
could become a model for similar efforts covering subject matter
most
appropriately dealt with at a global level. For the ITU, gaining
control of core Internet resources represents an opportunity to put
the Internet-genie back in the bottle and gain a greater measure of
relevance in the IP networking world. The ITU doesn't see itself as
merely an overseer of the old circuit-switched networks, which it
presides over today, but as the overseer of all networks, including
the Internet.
While ICANN has its flaws, it also possesses important, unique
characteristics. Two are worthy of special note. First, ICANN's form
of governance explicitly includes policy, technical, business and
user
interests under one roof. Each interest group has a formal role and
voice in both policy-making and governance. Each has a stake in the
proceedings, and each is an important part of the system. (Yes,
users'
voices need be heard more, and as an active participant in the ICANN
process and member of the 2005 ICANN Nominating Committee I will
continue to work toward that goal). Having these combined interests
explicitly inside the process avoids some of the perversions that we
have seen in other forms of governance, campaign finance being
perhaps
the starkest example.
Second, ICANN is a truly global organization. It is global in the
sense that individuals involved represent one of the above-mentioned
interests, but not national governments. This is an important
concept
in that the Internet is truly a global resource, but it is this
unique
element that creates the greatest challenge. We have no model for
managing a global resource of this nature. There are numerous models
for managing international resources, resources being managed
between
nations, but that is not what the Internet is. In this regard, ICANN
mirrors the Internet in that it works by "rough consensus." The
checks
and balances are systemic. This is what has allowed the price of
domain names to drop by 50- to 75 percent over the last five years
while service levels have increased dramatically. This is what has
allowed the [6]Uniform Dispute Resolution Process (UDRP) to
eliminate
cybersquatting of trademarks.
The U.N.'s WSIS contains 40 delegates, including members from Cuba,
China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe, Tunisia, Pakistan, Syria,
Russia
and Egypt. If the U.N. controlled domain names and IP addresses, the
ability of countries to censor the Internet would be greatly
enhanced,
as well as the ability to tax or impose other regulatory burdens on
these resources in order to fund unrelated projects of any kind.
In fact, if the U.N. and the ITU were successful, it is not
difficult
to envision a Balkanization of the Internet as whole portions of the
Internet decide they did not want to rely on the U.N. and the ITU
for
their single authoritative root. If that Balkanization were to take
place, the damage to the global economy would be incalculable.
In addition, these Internet governance positions would not be plum
U.N. postings. We could expect to see the likes of Internet pioneer
Vint Cerf replaced by some dictator's wife's third cousin.
The U.N./ITU put forward two main arguments for replacing ICANN.
They
claim that it's necessary to wrest control of the Internet from the
United States and that ICANN is a private organization that is
beholden to no one and that represents no one.
To be clear, ICANN is a not-for-profit California corporation that
nominally reports to the US Department of Commerce and operates
under
a memorandum of understanding with the agency that is reviewed and
renewed in six-month intervals.
Despite this, ICANN is not American--it is global. There are three
Americans on a 15-person board of directors. There are six Americans
on the 22-person generic names-supporting organization (GNSO)
council,
the main policy-making body. Two Americans are on the 10-person
at-large advisory council (ALAC). There has not been a meeting in
the
US since November 2001, and the earliest possibility of a US meeting
is in June 2007, a 17-meeting gap (the last North American
meeting was
in Montreal in June 2003, and the next is in Vancouver in December).
As for it being representative, ICANN has always had one
prerequisite
for involvement--a willingness to take the time and effort to
participate. There is active representation from Internet
communities
from around the world. The level of participation, the quality of
participation and the output of the process have steadily improved
over ICANN's history. Neither the U.N. nor the ITU can make any of
these claims. Participation in their processes require a position in
or through a national government or a Telco monopoly, neither of
which
are known for their deep appreciation and understanding of the
Internet.
There is no doubt that both the U.N. and the ITU are much more adept
at politics than either ICANN staff or the vast majority of
participants in the ICANN process. That makes the threat here all
the
more real.
It is important to remember that we all rely on the rich ecosystem
that is the free Internet. We are all beneficiaries of the
innovation
it spawns, the information it provides and the interaction it
supports. We cannot take this for granted.
Companies that rely on a free Internet--and there are few technology
companies that don't--need to become active in the ICANN process
through the [7]Business or ISP Constituencies; other institutions
and
not-for-profits through the [8]non-commercial constituency.
Companies,
institutions and individuals from around the world who have
access to
their governments' decision makers need to let them know that the
Internet needs to stay free and that supporting ICANN supports that
principle. Individuals who care about the future of the Internet and
believe they can contribute to creating a better ICANN and
preserving
a freer Internet should think about the ICANN nominating committee's
call for [9]Statements of Interest, which seeks qualified candidates
to help the organization move forward.
The Internet has contributed more to freedom, education and
innovation
than any other advance of the last number of decades. It deserves to
be protected from the people and the institutions that do not
share an
appreciation for preserving the values upon which the Internet was
founded.
Elliot Noss is president and CEO of [10]Tucows, an Internet services
company that provides back office solutions and wholesale Internet
services to a global network of more than 6,000 service providers.
Tucows is a domain name registrar and both participates in the ICANN
process and benefits from it. Noss is a member of the 2005 ICANN
Nominating Committee.
References
1. http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-5730589.html
2. http://www.itu.int/home/
3. http://www.icann.org/
4. http://www.itu.int/wsis/
5. http://www.wgig.org/
6. http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp.htm
7. http://gnso.icann.org/commercial-and-business/
8. http://gnso.icann.org/non-commercial/
9. http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-29apr05.htm
10. http://resellers.tucows.com/about/
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/