[IP] more on Apple to ditch IBM, switch to Intel chips | CNET News.com
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jeff Porten <civitan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 4, 2005 5:38:57 PM EDT
To: David Farber <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IP] Apple to ditch IBM, switch to Intel chips | CNET
News.com
For IP, a write-up of the Intel issue that I sent around to my
clients this morning.
Best,
Jeff
CNET is reporting that Apple will announce a switch to Intel chips on
Monday at the WWDC. The article was posted after 5 PM Friday,
presumably timed to avoid affecting the stocks of the companies
involved.
<http://news.com.com/Apple+to+ditch+IBM%2C+switch+to+Intel+chips/
2100-1006_3-5731398.html?part=rss&tag=5731398&subj=news>
This follows a report in the WSJ that said that Apple was talking to
Intel. The original article pointed out that Intel makes many chips
that are of interest to Apple (notably WiMax and portable electronics
devices), and so this didn't necessarily cover the PPC family. Most
of the people who parroted the article on the Internet and elsewhere
extrapolated this to mean a chip change and left out the finer
details. John Gruber wrote an article last week debunking these
rumors, which I agree with:
<http://daringfireball.net/2005/05/intelmania>
However, CNET has a good rep and presumably would not have run this
story without a strong source. Presumably we'll know about the
details on Monday. The Jobs keynote is scheduled for 1 PM EDT; from
what I can see there isn't a public web stream, but it's safe to say
that whatever he says will hit the Internet within seconds after it
occurs.
As Gruber points out, an architecture shift would require the re-
release of all Mac software recompiled for the new chip. In some
cases, changes to the source would be necessary (although not all
cases, since software relying on libraries within OS X would continue
to run with the same code). But it would mean getting new binaries,
and it's safe to presume that in some cases this would mean
repurchasing the software as opposed to a free download. The 680x0
to PPC transition was eased because the latter could emulate the
former; in this case, barring an engineering miracle from Apple, you
can forget about that happening at reasonable speeds.
More to the point, I'm highly skeptical of this report because of the
uncertainty it raises for Apple's core business. Apple makes most of
its money on hardware, and even if they deliberately try to prevent
OS X from running on other Intel machines, this will inspire a legion
of hackers to release workarounds to allow OS X to run on the
cheapest hardware at Wal-Mart. I have trouble believing that Apple
could engineer something that would make all such hacks impossible,
and that would be a big hit to Apple's hardware business. There
would also be a significant dampening of Apple hardware purchases
leading up to the release of Intel models. I have similar trouble
believing that Apple doesn't realize this.
On the side saying this is all true, it's long been rumored that an
Intel Mac OS X would cause a shift in market share as people had a
cheap way to try it out. (The Mac Mini is seen as exactly the
hardware that would dispel such rumors, being its own entry level
path.) Jobs is said to be very annoyed about the lack of a 3 GHz G5
chip, and the inability of IBM to produce a low-power G5 for
laptops. If Apple's engineers decided that IBM was going to drop the
ball on this going forward, then that's a potential reason for a
shift of this magnitude.
According to CNET, the shift will start with the Minis in 2006, and
hit the towers in 2007. No word as to how the migration will occur
in laptops, iMacs or Xserves.
If this is true, then we should expect to see a somewhat slower
release schedule for new features in software, as engineering
resources will be bled off for the migration. [Client-specific
discussion redacted.]
-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To manage your subscription, go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/